CoA pleased with ICC's decision to rule in BCCI’s favour in MoU dispute

SportsCafe Desk
no photo

The Committee of Administrators has expressed happiness after the International Cricket Council’s dispute resolution panel ruled a case against BCCI by PCB in the former’s favour. The PCB was asking for compensation from BCCI for the loss of revenue due to lack of bilateral cricket.

The International Cricket Council(ICC) has dismissed the Pakistan Cricket Board’s case against the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) in which the Pakistan Board had claimed compensation in the tune of 70 million USD. The PCB had alleged that the Indian Cricket Board did not play any bilateral cricket after signing the MoU accepting to do so. 

The Supreme Court appointed CoA expressed its happiness after the International Cricket Council(ICC) announced its decision. Vinod Rai on behalf of the CoA also said that the BCCI will file a counterclaim demanding the litigation expenses from the PCB

“I would like to thank the BCCI legal team as well as everyone who worked on this arbitration,” Rai said.

“We will make a presentation to the panel and demand entire cost of compensation to be borne by the PCB for the arbitration where there claims have been dismissed.”  

The PCB reacted with disappointment and stated that they will study the decision and then will take any further decision. 

“The PCB notes with regret the decision of the Disputes Resolution Committee,” their statement said.

The panel was chaired by Hon. Michael Beloff QC, an English barrister and a member of Blackstone Chambers, Jan Paulsson and Annabelle Bennett in hearings that took place in Dubai from October 1-3. The issue is an old one when then BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel in 2014 had signed a one-page document which BCCI always termed as the 'proposal letter’ to play six bilateral series between 2015 to 2023 on home-and-away basis. The PCB banking on the document filed for compensation claiming revenue loss but the ICC dismissed the case stating the agreement was not binding.

“It follows inexorably that the PCB’s claim must fail. If there was no obligation on the BCCI to engage in the tours in either 2014 or 2015, its omission to do so was no breach and gave rise to no damages claim.

“The Panel accepts that the awareness of the BCCI’s claimed need for government approval was indeed reflected not only in PCB e-mails but also in minutes of PCB board meetings, all of which were aggregated in the BCCIs helpful schedule to its written submissions,” the ICC judgement read.

laught0
astonishment0
sadness0
heart0
like0
dislike0

Comments

Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions

0 Comments