Sandeep Patil believes footwork is not key to good batting
Former Indian Cricketer, Sandeep Patil believes that the whole footwork thing working in Cricket is overrated and that is not the actual key to good batting skills. Patil believes that the good technique, sharp senses, and confidence are needed to be successful in being a good batsman.
Foot-work has always been touted as a key component to have for a batsman and the lack of it resulted in being caught plumb in front, more often than not. The likes of Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid were supreme batsmen due to their immaculate foot-work, but the likes of Chris Gayle and Virender Sehwag could never reach that level due to their apparent failure in tackling the off-seaming and away-going deliveries. However, Sandeep Patil stated that confidence, technique, and keen eyes had helped him out when he was playing in England rather than very good
“This footwork thing is over-blown. You should have good technique, keen eye and, most importantly, confidence. That is what helped me when I played in England. True I played just two Tests there but I did have several seasons in
Sandeep Patil had hit six fours in one over at Old Trafford in the 1982 Test series, completely baffling the bowler, Bob Willis. Patil made an unbeaten 129 in the same match.
“It just happened. It was my day. That’s it. He was a gentleman, a fantastic bowler and had to be watched closely. At the end of
“I think my batting average in the
Patil was an expert at handling bowlers like Ian Botham, Derek Pringle, Paul Allott and Bob Willis. He believes the whole concern over the English Weather condition is completely exaggerated.
“I think it is all made up. I hardly faced any issues. Not that I scored runs in the thousands in England but I was not in any discomfort. I was lucky that Tatas sponsored my trip to England in 1979 to play some club cricket. I even bowled to the Indian team on tour then in the nets,” said Patil.
“I did not fail because I
Comments
Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions
0 Comments