Twitter perplexed as sneaky Asadulla's greed converts Mahedi's dead ball into comical wicket
There has always been an endless supply of bizarre dismissals in cricket but rarely if ever they have been such self-inflicted. An embarrassing blooper by Mahedi Hasan in Bangladesh's National Cricket League turned to his advantage when Asadulla Al Galib tried to take advantage.
Sylhet took a commanding first innings lead of 223 runs against Khulna on the back of Asadulla Al Galib's 115 and Amite Hasan's double ton that took the team to 497 in the first innings. However, the centurion's knock ended in hilarious fashion when the ball slipped out of Mahedi Hasan's hand.
The red cherry soared high in the air and while Mahedi and the umpire turned around trying to locate where it had ended up, Asadulla took the opportunity to dance halfway down the track and try to clear the long-on boundary. However, the ball went only as far as the fielder on the boundary and Mahedi was ecstatic at having been gifted a wicket.
The spinner ended up with a four-fer and earned much attention to Twitter due to his antics.
LOL! WHAT?
Mahedi Hasan takes the wicket of the year.
— Mohammad Isam (@Isam84) November 10, 2024
Video courtesy: BCB pic.twitter.com/Vzmay6AOG2
This is hilarious bruh!!!
@dadua_daku , your boys at it again
— Jai (@krismatic) November 11, 2024
ROLF!
well the batting team is 3/465 they needed to try something to get a wicket
— robbie (@robbierocket7) November 11, 2024
THIS CAN'T BE REALL!!! GODDD!
It was nice trick by Mehdy to break the partnership.
— Aftab (@ahmadktweets) November 11, 2024
True!
The batsman wanted the wicket more than the bowler
— M.ARAVIND (@ARAVINDsince96) November 10, 2024
Just get out like this!
Why waste good balls.
— Graham Downey (@RAnobreaks1978) November 10, 2024
Hahaha!
Aur chedo Dead ball ko 🤣
— Divyansh Mahato (@Mahato_Divyansh) November 10, 2024
What do you think?
Isn't that a weird batting stance?
— Xander (@Xarnder180) November 10, 2024
Comments
Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions
0 Comments