Twitter reacts as Yuzvendra Chahal misses his 'century' by 12 runs
It was a nightmare for Yuzvendra Chahal today as he conceded 88 runs in his quota of overs. The funny part is not only Indians but also Pakistanis and Bangladeshis will be disappointed with Chahal's performance today. Twitterati responded by trolling him for his terrible display.
Brief Scores: England 337/7 in 50 overs (Jonny Bairstow 111, Ben Stokes 79; Mohammad Shami 5/69; Jasprit Bumrah 1/44) vs India
Milestone missed!
Chahal missed his century by 12 runs.#INDvENG
— Wajahat Δ (@wajkht) June 30, 2019
Donated*
Chahal made 88 runs for England! https://t.co/nJ1hjgUx00
— Mahendra Singh Dots (@Parlo_Tweets) June 30, 2019
Golden Tweet! :P
Virat kohli literally yells 'Ben Stokes' or 'kam mar Joe Root' every time chahal bowls today! #INDvENG #CWC2019
— Utkarsh (@eternalsunny) June 30, 2019
If you know what I mean!
@yuzi_chahal is the most patriotic player #INDvENG
— Unpaid Troll 🗿 (@unpaidtroll) June 30, 2019
Everybody can agree to this!
Kachra is better spinner then indian bowler chahal 😠😠🤧💯#INDvENG pic.twitter.com/OrVPARMtxP
— Nitin Sehrawat B+ (@nitinsehra10) June 30, 2019
Every Indian right now!
All Indians to #chahal today #cwc19 #engvsind #INDvsENG pic.twitter.com/v7NZ5ckd0T
— Ashish Kishor Pamak (@AshishPamak) June 30, 2019
It's a curse!
Pakistan is supporting India and India start playing like Pakistan#INDvENG https://t.co/qQVumn6PLz
— Raja Wajid Hussain (@RajaaSain) June 30, 2019
The situation right now!
#INDvENG #ENGvIND #ICCWorldCup2019 #chahal #KuldeepYadav pic.twitter.com/qeIbmksNEB
— Skeptical_indian (@pk_16O1991) June 30, 2019
Hilarious!
One bad match for Chahal and briNg baCk pans are posting "missing AshWin"
— Santanu (@santanuzn) June 30, 2019
Chahal burnt!
Yeah Virat, you probably didn't need to give Chahal 10 overs today mate. Even Chahal, the ex chess player, would have to admit it wasn't a great move.😬 #easypickings #ENGvIND #CWC2019
— James McOnie (@JamesMcOnie) June 30, 2019
Comments
Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions
0 Comments