MS Dhoni accused of misleading High Court
MS Dhoni has been accused of 'wilfully' misleading the court and creating 'alarmist circumstances' by Max Mobilink Pvt Ltd, for whom he has been a brand ambassador. The Indian ODI captain had filed a case against the company alleging that they had used his name even after the end of their contract.

MS Dhoni had been contracted into a sponsorship deal until 2012 by Max Mobilink Pvt Ltd, the makers of the Maxx mobile phones. However, sometime after the end of the contract period, Dhoni had filed a complaint stating that the telecom company was using his name even after the contract had expired. Dhoniâs lawyer had alleged that Maxx been âin direct violationâ of court orders by continuing the use of the cricketerâs name, jersey number and images for their MSD 07 Phone even after the association between the two parties had ended.
Rajneesh Chopra, the advocate who had appeared on Dhoniâs behalf, had also accused the company of unlawful use of the cricketerâs image and videos on their website and Facebook pages as well.
Justice J R Midha had also instructed Maxx Mobileâs Ajjay Agarwal to file an affidavit containing all the information about the stocks of the said product available with them when the courtâs order was imposed on November 17,
âWhat instruction it (Maxx Mobile) has given with regard to removal of petitionerâs (Dhoni) name from the product (mobile and its box) to the printer,â the court had said according to the Hindustan Times.
Now
Agarwal and Max Mobilink are seeking compensation over Dhoni's plea for initiating contempt against the former and the case to be dismissed.
âThe respondent has committed willful contempt, and have also substantially interfered with the administration of justice,â the plea had claimed a reported by the Indian Express.
According to the PTI, Agarwal, in his affidavit filed before Justice Manmohan, said, âI say and submit that the company has removed all material from its own websites and from social media websites including Facebook. However, at this juncture, I say and submit that the petitioner number one (Dhoni) is guilty of wilfully misleading this court for the sake of creating alarmist circumstances.â
Agarwal also reiterated that the company had not used any of Dhoniâs brand name on social media platforms for any financial benefits.

Comments
Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions
0 Comments