ICC refuses to defend BCCI from Lodha committee reforms
ICC CEO David Richardson, on Monday, said that they will not be intervening with the reforms recommended by the Lodha committee to be implemented within the Board of Control for Cricket in India. The Supreme Court has ordered the BCCI to implement the reforms by the end of this year.
The BCCI's criticism of the ICC's recent decisions seems to have resulted in the ICC pulling out its helping hand in the legal matter involving the BCCI and the Lodha committee which was appointed to propose administrative changes in the BCCI.
In July 2016, the Supreme Court of India had told the BCCI that the reforms in the Lodha committee report need to be implemented—the first phase of reforms by September 30, and the next phase by the end of December. And like many sports, cricket also has the rule which states that the governments should not interfere in the administration of its member associations. Now, with the Lodha committee breathing down its neck, the BCCI had requested the ICC to send a letter to them so that the Supreme Court's interference can be limited. However, speaking to the PTI on Monday, the ICC Chief Executive Officer David Richardson said, "The BCCI president Mr Thakur did verbally ask the ICC to write a letter to the BCCI asking the BCCI to explain whether the recommendations of Lodha Committee might constitute government interference.
"But Mr Manohar said that the ICC should not write such a letter unless the BCCI first writes to the ICC requesting ICC to intervene, or ICC receives a letter from another of its member boards to do so. But no such letters have been received.”
Recently, the BCCI President Anurag Thakur had accused Shashank Manohar for leaving the BCCI when the Lodha committee had set out their report thus staying away from the legal tussle between the Board and the judiciary. Richardson also pointed out that since this was a verbal request from the BCCI President, the ICC cannot proceed without a formal request.
"So I understand that Mr Manohar is reluctant to interfere in the domestic affairs of a member country. He will not do so without being formally requested to do so by the member concerned and nor is he prepared to put the ICC in a position where it could be perceived as challenging the authority of the Supreme Court of India.
"Don't forget... the consequences of the government interference could lead to the suspension of a member board and nobody really wants the BCCI to be suspended,” he explained.
Richardson also revealed that Thakur was unhappy with the ICC turning down the request which clearly is a result of bad blood between the two cricketing bodies.
"There were other board members present when that request was made by Mr Thakur. As far as I see, Mr Thakur actually criticised the ICC for not sending the letter," Richardson said.
Comments
Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions
0 Comments