CSK vs RCB | Twitter laughs as Patidar incorrectly plays captaincy card to deny Kohli DRS

SportsCafe Desk
no photo

Nothing can humble egos like sports can, for time and again it makes even the invincible taste defeat and reminds legends of their mortality. Virat Kohli was politely reminded he is not captain anymore on Friday after Rajat Patidar denied his request for a DRS while batting, a move that backfired.

Royal Challengers Bengaluru managed to aggregate 93 runs for the loss of two wickets halfwaway through their innings after Phil Salt and Devdutt Padikkal paid rapid cameos to cover for Virat Kohli's sluggish start of 16 runs in his first 22 deliveries. By the eighth over, skipper Rajat Patidar had walked out to the crease to give the talisman company, and the duo's simultaneous presence at the crease made for some amusing viewing, with an incident in the ninth over perfectly symbolizing their revamped relationship for the season.

Kohli was up against Matheesha Pathira who fired in a lethal bumper on the second ball that flew over Virat Kohli's attempted hook shot and into MS Dhoni's gloves. The square-leg umpire was quick to signal it was the fist bouncer of the over and Kohli instantly threw a fit demanding a wide. The disbelief was writ large on the veteran's face as walked down the pitch to consult with Patidar, knowing that the IPL allows players to review wide calls, and was about to go upstairs when he realized he was not the one in charge of making the calls anymore. As the 37-year-old brought his hands back down, he let out a laugh and his captain reciprocated, making for a wholesome moment even though the replays showed that Kohli was correct in demanding a DRS.

Twitterati wa all to pleased with more narrative in the ever thrilling RCB storyline. 

Kohli wanted it!

Bad luck

Imagine

Fire

Superb

Sad

Removed

2 crucial ones

Gone

Just wow!

Follow the link and enter the draw to win prizes for registering at SportsCafe.in

Comments

0/1000

Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions

0 Comments