World Cup 2019 | Cheteshwar Pujara should be India's number four in ODIs, claims Sourav Ganguly
Sourav Ganguly reckons that Test specialist, Cheteshwar Pujara, would be the ideal candidate to bat at number four in the current Indian batting order ahead of the upcoming World Cup. Ganguly further added that he would pick Delhi youngster, Rishabh Pant, over veteran Dinesh Karthik in the ODI team.
With the 2019 ICC ODI World Cup fast approaching, the Indian selection committee
While Ambati Rayudu leads the line to fill the number four spot, former India captain Sourav Ganguly reckons that Test specialist - Cheteshwar Pujara - will serve as the ideal candidate to bat at that position in the ODI format.
"See, I am going to say something that might not sound believable to many viewers and a lot of people might laugh at my suggestion. But for me, Cheteshwar Pujara should be India's No.4 in ODIs. His fielding might be a bit weak but he is a very good batsman. I know people will be shocked by my claim but if you want a quality batsman who is better than the options India has tried off late, I think Pujara is the best choice.
"I believe Pujara has the capability to perform the role that Rahul Dravid used to do for India in ODIs. But this would have been my personal decision and I know a lot of people won't agree with me on this. Sometimes, you need solidity in one-day cricket and Pujara provides you with that in ample measure," Ganguly said in IndiaTV’s show ‘Cricket Ki Baat.’
The former India batsman also went on to comment on the situation involving Delhi’s Rishabh Pant and veteran Indian batsman - Dinesh Karthik. Ganguly believes that if one were to choose between the two, Pant should be preferred over Karthik for the World Cup squad.
"I would back Rishabh Pant over Dinesh Karthik. The latter has played a lot of cameos but we haven't seen him play
"But it is quite possible that none of either Pant or Karthik
Cricket FootBall Kabaddi
Basketball Hockey
SportsCafe
Comments
Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions
0 Comments