SA vs SL | Twitter reacts to comedy of errors leading to de Kock and van der Dussen both surviving runouts on same ball

SportsCafe Desk
no photo

It is very common to see teams showcasing amazing fielding skills on the field and also showing some silly misfields at the same time. In the World Cup clash between Sri Lanka and South Africa, a fielding blunder and confusion between the Proteas batters appeared like a comedy of errors.

In the fourth World Cup Match between Sri Lanka and South Africa at the Arun Jaitely Stadium in Delhi, Sri Lankan skipper Dasun Shanaka won the toss and elected to bowl first. The Proteas lost an early wicket with their skipper Temba Bavuma getting dismissed to a peach of a delivery by Dilshan Madushanka in the second over. Quinton de Kock and Rassie van der Dussen put up a 204-run partnership for the second wicket. 

On the first delivery of the 27th over, bowled by Pathirana, de Kock, who was on strike edged the ball behind square on the offside and tried to sneak a quick single calling out van der Dussen. The SA wicketkeeper, however, had a change of heart and called for his partner to go back. The problem was that van der Dussen was already past the midway point of the wicket and it left him in no-man's land open to an easy runout the non-striker’s end. 

In the meantime, Sadeera Samawickrama had collected the ball and all he needed to do was throw the ball towards the non striker’s end for an easy wicket. The Sri Lankan though decided to have a shy at the striker’s end. De Kock, who had assumed that the ball would be thrown at the other end did not try to make his crease. The ball missed the stumps by a very close margin with de Kock nowhere close to his crease. 

Twitter reacted to this series of errors and utter confusions on the field with some hilarious tweets.

What a miss!

Totally!

LOL

Focus

Absolute comedy!

Style!

Brilliant

Mega total!

Rassie

So happy!!

laught0
astonishment0
sadness0
heart0
like0
dislike0

Comments

Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions

0 Comments