PAK vs ENG | Twitter reacts as Woakes turns Big Foot to rob England of Salman Agha's scalp

Debayan Sinha

ByDebayan Sinha, SportsCafe Editor

41
no photo

Sometimes, a valiant effort can come to nothing, and a small misstep can change the outcome. Such was the case on the second day of the Test match between Pakistan and England when Chris Woakes made an impressive attempt at a boundary catch turned futile, only for it to turn into a six.

ā€ŒPakistan showcased an impressive batting performance, accumulating over 400 runs by Day 2, with contributions from Abdullah Shafique and Shan Masoodā€™s half-centuries on Day 1. Saud Shakeelā€™s gritty 74 off 160 deliveries anchored the innings on Day 2, taking Pakistan to 419/6 in 116 overs. Shakeel, along with Salman Agha built a 44-run partnership, but Agha had a narrow escape thanks to Chris Woakesā€™ valiant fielding effort which ultimately counted for nothing as it was ruled a six.

On the third ball of the 117th over, Jack Leach bowled a tossed-up delivery outside off-stump, which Agha stepped down to drive towards long-off. Though he aimed for a six, he mistimed the shot, sending the ball high but without enough distance. Positioned at long-off, Woakes backtracked and initially pulled off a stunning catch, flicking the ball back into play and maintaining his balance. However, the TV umpire decided to review the effort.

Upon further inspection, it was revealed that as Woakes completed the catch, his right boot briefly touched the boundary cushion before he threw the ball back into the field. This led to the third umpire ruling it a six. The on-field umpire, Kumar Dharmasena, signalled the six, leaving the English team disappointed and Woakesā€™ brilliant effort unrecognized, sparking a frenzy on social media.

Ā Incredible

Close but

Just wow

Baffled

LOL

Good question

Controversial

Great try

Dejected

Superb

Get updates! Follow us on

laught1
astonishment1
sadness1
heart1
like1
dislike1

Comments

Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions

0 Comments