Follow us

Finger injury makes Quinton de Kock doubtful for IPL 2017

no image
no image

South Africa wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock suffered an injury to his finger during the second Test of the ongoing series against New Zealand. That injury makes him a doubtful starter for the remaining Tests and the upcoming season of the IPL, where he represents Delhi Darevelis.

An X-ray of De Kock’s finger on Wednesday had shown that he has suffered a ligament damage in the second Test of the ongoing three-match series against New Zealand in Hamilton.

Wicketkeeper Heinrich Klaasen is all set to make his debut if De Kock fails a late medical Test on Friday. South Africa’s manager and team doctor Mohammed Moosajee was quoted as saying, "we’ll make a late call whether, with the protective strapping the physio is trying to arrange, he can bat.”

However, there’s very little chance that De Kock will make the cut as Moosajee said, “Every time he catches the ball, stress goes on that area. He is going to need a period of recovery. There is every likelihood he will pull out.”

This is likely to rule him out of the upcoming IPL season where he was scheduled to play for the Delhi Daredevils. Not only is De Kock likely to miss the IPL, he may also be a doubt for the Champions Trophy, to be played in England in June.

Comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments

read previous‌Martin Guptill hangs boot from international cricket
Renowned New Zealand cricketer Martin Guptill has confirmed his international retirement at the age of 38 on Wednesday. He last represented the national side in a five-match T20I series against Bangladesh in October 2022 and will feature in franchise tournaments across the globe.
I am not sure if Kohli knows how to say 'Sorry', says Cricket Australia Boss James Sutherlandread next
Cricket Australia chief James Sutherland has taken a swipe at Virat Kohli by saying that he’s not sure if the Indian skipper knows how to spell the word ‘Sorry’, in response to a radio station asking him, if he thinks Kohli should apologize to Steve Smith for questioning the latter's integrity.
View non-AMP page